Consoles, past and future.

Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net
Fri Sep 2 03:08:37 PDT 2005


On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20050902053927.3656b245 at localhost>, Tom Rhodes writes:
> 
> 
> >My question is, and I know this hasn't been tested so be my
> >guest and theorize a bit.  Are there any performance gains
> >or losses as a result of taking this route?
> 
> If we are concerned about the performance of /dev/console, we
> need our collective heads and tails smacked until we come to
> our senses :-)

Somebody fortune this! :)

(Hey, 'fortune' is a verb, innit now?)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev	roam at ringlet.net    roam at cnsys.bg    roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050902/8eb63d07/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list