Consoles, past and future.
Peter Pentchev
roam at ringlet.net
Fri Sep 2 03:08:37 PDT 2005
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20050902053927.3656b245 at localhost>, Tom Rhodes writes:
>
>
> >My question is, and I know this hasn't been tested so be my
> >guest and theorize a bit. Are there any performance gains
> >or losses as a result of taking this route?
>
> If we are concerned about the performance of /dev/console, we
> need our collective heads and tails smacked until we come to
> our senses :-)
Somebody fortune this! :)
(Hey, 'fortune' is a verb, innit now?)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam at ringlet.net roam at cnsys.bg roam at FreeBSD.org
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20050902/8eb63d07/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list