Retiring static libpam support

[Doug Rabson]

On 13 Jun 2005, at 17:49, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Doug Rabson <dfr at nlsystems.com> writes:
>> You can link statically to some libraries and dynamically to others
>> - that might work quite well. You would probably end up linking
>> dynamically to libc otherwise you might get two copies of libc when
>> you load a pam module.
>
> That won't help.  You'll still end up with two copies of *libpam*.

It depends exactly what Julian needs to link with statically - it 
wasn't clear. When I build my own software 'statically' I tend to still 
link to the system libraries dynamically.