Retiring static libpam support

[Richard Coleman]

Julian Elischer wrote:
> Or force us to abandon static linking of apps,
> which might be an OK decision, but basically
> I think it's kind of the thin edge of the wedge for fully desupporting 
> all static
> binaries.  if nothing that does authentication
> can be static then there is no such thing any more as a fully static system
> and one might as well just not bother.

I think that has been the inevitable outcome (fully desupporting static 
binaries) all along.

Richard Coleman
rcoleman at criticalmagic.com