/usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
cperciva at freebsd.org
Sat Aug 6 17:36:41 GMT 2005
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> I doubt it presents much problem as regards the 'running out' issue
> anyway. Things like fsck time, maybe. But I've got a rather oldish
> and rather smallish /var, and:
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
> /dev/da1s1f 992M 266M 647M 29% 3802 250148 1% /var
Your "rather oldish and rather smallish" /var is four times the default
size used in sysinstall (256MB is used for /, /tmp, and /var if you have
a large enough drive). This default results in having ~32000 inodes.
I wonder if it's time to increase the default size of /var again.
More information about the freebsd-arch