/sys/conf is getting unwieldy to handle...

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Oct 4 04:06:41 PDT 2004

In message <200410041241.04608.max at love2party.net>, Max Laier writes:

>Yes, this would create something I liked to call "meta-options" in former=20
>discussions on this topic.
>Yet, there is a bit more to it. It would (imo) also involve some thinking=20
>about the way we build modules (there is a TODO item "revised kld build=20
>infrastructure" that seems to cover that part) and maybe also a bit of=20
>reorganization/coalescence of the opt_*.h include mechanism ...
>I have thought about this a bit already, so I'd like to help (if my babblin=
>makes sense to you ;)

Well, I didn't really plan to get involved in this apart from using it,
this was merely an attempt to encourage people with more spare time
than me to pick up the ball.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list