Forcefully unmounting devfs...

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Dec 21 15:34:43 PST 2004


On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:25:35AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20041221232354.GA28374 at xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes:
> >
> >--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >> >Either disable forceful unmount of devfs, which makes sense from
> >> >KISS and many other principles, and then jail wardens will have to
> >> >find other ways to clean up their jails
> >
> >> >The more I think about it, the more I lean towards the first option.
> >> >
> >>=20
> >> I think that I'd agree here from the point of view of finding an=20
> >> expedient way to keep from shooting off feet.
> >
> >Unfortunately that's going to cause me a fair amount of pain, unless
> >there's a simple way to kill all processes running in a given chroot
> >(NB: I don't currently use jails because a number of ports won't build
> >in a jail) so I can free up the devfs and then unmount it.
> 
> But unmounting it forcefully is not guaranteed to clean up your
> chroot today...

Well, at least the filesystem presence disappears so I can reuse the
mountpoint.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20041221/1b6830bb/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-arch mailing list