mtx_lock_recurse/mtx_unlock_recurse functions
(proof-of-concept).
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
pjd at FreeBSD.org
Thu Apr 8 14:59:52 PDT 2004
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
+> >As was discussed, it will be helpful to have functions, that are able
+> >to acquire lock recursively, even if lock itself isn't recursable.
+>
+> Sounds evil to me...
Why? I don't think that better is to just use MTX_RECURSE if we don't need
it in 90% of cases. And sometimes it is really hard to pass information if
lock is held or not, just like for that rwatson's kqueue thing.
+> Does your patch also make witness aware of this ?
Nope, it is just a proof-of-concept and as jhb@ pointed out, we want
to keep our interface simple, so it probably will never reach the tree.
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org
pjd at FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/attachments/20040408/a1e0a355/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-arch
mailing list