Meta: explain what where when? (was Re: userland access to
devices is moving!)
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Wed Jun 18 12:05:21 PDT 2003
In message <20030618190032.GG10127 at over-yonder.net>, "Matthew D. Fuller" writes:
>> I do on the other hand not think that emails to arch@ is the best forum
>> for the in-depth explanations.
>Oh, absolutely! And to understand an in-depth explanation, I'd have to
>dig into the code anyway to understand it.
>I was aiming more at a throwaway statement like, "This will clean up a
>lot of code and make it easier to understand and debug," or [...]
Ahh, ok. Yeah, I guess we have a tendency to write with the usual
suspects as implied target. I'll try to remember that.
>> The "blueprint" articles which I am trying to restart in DæmonNews
>> may not be either, but I think they are more the right kind of
>> forum for it. I am still warming up to the article format, and the
>> amount of feedback so far has not really given me any feel for how
>> complex issues I can tackle without the readers just skipping the
>That's an interesting way to go, and certainly something worthwhile.
>Poking at the site now, I see the one from May on userland/kernel
>interfaces; has there been more?
I hope the next one is in the pipeline...
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-arch