libthr and 1:1 threading.

[Igor Sysoev]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:

> I have to ask:
> 
> Why is it so important to people that the libthr performance
> gains be impossible to achieve without use of the 1:1 model,
> rather than a modification of libc_r, or avoidance of existing
> kernel latencies?

If you mean that "people" is my humble person then I want to say
that I am not against 1:1 model libthr, KSE's M:N model, current
or improved libc_r, rfork()ed LinuxThreads and any possible future
threads implementation.

My last emails were caused only by your incorrect statements about
a non-blocking behaviour of Solaris disk files.


Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/