need some hint about how to handle the following issue (new bsd.apache.mk)

Tue Mar 29 22:04:47 UTC 2011

On 03/29/11 22:03, Olli Hauer wrote:
> The use of commonXX is clear, maybe the following explains
> better why I ask.
> 
> -.if !defined(Apache_Pre_Include) || defined(PORT_IS_MODULE)
> +.if !defined(Apache_Pre_Include) || defined(AP_PORT_IS_MODULE)
Wowser, long standing typo.  Good catch.  You should include it as part
of the 22 -exp request.

Nice!

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin,                 Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-apache/attachments/20110329/1175c696/signature.pgp