kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD

[O. Hartmann]

Ceri Davies wrote:
> Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: ceri
> State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> State-Changed-Why: 
> ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer.
> This is an interesting test case though.
>
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: ceri
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> Scheduler problem.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85820
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-amd64 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>   
Very interesting to read. And this is now the end of the newly
introduced allround weapon for more scalability?