Benchmarks: AMD64 vs i386 on Dual 246 Opteron

[Martin Cracauer]

ray at redshift.com wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:06:09AM -0700: 
> At 07:35 PM 7/28/2005 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> | > While this sounded like a long shot, I loaded FreeBSD 5.4 i386 on the machine
> | > and after applying the exact same configuration to the OS, Apache, PHP and
> | > MySQL, re-ran the benchmarks.  Much to my surprise, just changing the OS
> from 64
> | > bit to 32 bit caused the machine to double in speed.  The results are attached
> | > in an Excel spreadsheet.  So the exact same machine, running the identical
> | > configuration, performed roughly twice as fast when running FreeBSD 5.4 i386 vs
> | > FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64.  Something about this seems so wrong to me :-)
> | 
> | I'm sorry but I cannot support these findings.  I don't have
> | cut'n'paste numbers handy, but generally 64 bits speed up things quite
> | a bit for me.  I have seen slowdown in 64 bit mode in e.g. bzip2 but
> | generally there is a speedup.
> 
> Hi Martin - do you have any data to back up these statements?  If so, I'd like
> to see it.

I didn't keep my own benchmarks.

However, the Linux section on anandtech has a good deal of such benchmarks:
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2158
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2127
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2114

linuxhardware.com also has at least one article comparing 32 and 64
bit applications on the same box.

If you could kindly fix the NILs I get for numbers out of the new
CMUCL or at least the string lookup in SBCL I could go set up my
quad-boot opteron and get all the benchmarks we want :-)

Martin
-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer at cons.org>   http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
 No warranty.    This email is probably produced by one of my cats 
 stepping on the keys. No, I don't have an infinite number of cats.