Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For?

[Sander Vesik]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs at berklix.org> wrote:
> 
> Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify.  Let's
>         - Tell people to move to chat at freebsd.org.
>         - Report offenders to postmaster at freebsd.org for blocking.
>         - Request postmaster at freebsd.org appends to list definition:
>             "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go."
>           (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people
>           have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.)

I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example,
discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of
what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example
producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems
or similar.

> 
> -
> Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich       http://berklix.com
> Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
>