SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not...

[RacerX]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:

> RacerX writes:
>
>> That is a very harsh statement ...
>
> It's a very realistic statement.
>
>> Now that you have made it; show us the proof that you base your reply
>> on.
>
> I've explained it at length on many previous occasions.
>
>> Show us the urls that says what you said.
>
> Why are URLs more reliable than what I say?  What about URLs on my own
> site?
>
>> Show us the white papers that state what you have stated.
>
> Why are whitepapers more reliable than what I say?  What if I'm the
> author of the whitepaper?
>
> -- 
> Anthony
>

Then show us your proof - I do. I have a section on my site dedicated to 
FBSD as a desktop using various versions from 2.2.1 on up to 5.3-RC