SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.
com, why not...
Erich Dollansky
oceanare at pacific.net.sg
Mon Feb 14 18:30:42 PST 2005
Hi,
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Johnson David writes:
>
>
>>You seem to be arguing that because FreeBSD on the desktop isn't
>>suitable for everyone then it must be unsuitable for everyone. Get I
>>get the gist of your argument correct?
>
>
> No, what I'm arguing is that FreeBSD should be promoted as a server,
> because that's what it does best.
>
I do not understand why it has to be promoted like this at all.
FreeBSD itself ist just a plain operating system.
All the programs needed to make it a server or a desktop are in the ports.
As long as the programs needed for a certain purpose are in the ports,
FreeBSD is the choice. The moment the programs are not available in the
ports, do not use FreeBSD.
> Maybe this mindset needs to be changed. Most of the heavy-duty work in
This is so true.
Erich
More information about the freebsd-advocacy
mailing list