The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far....
chris at czv.com
Sun Feb 13 07:18:12 PST 2005
On Feb 13, 2005, at 8:02 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> The point is the lack of a company supporting FreeBSD like IBM does
> for Linux, is a reason for companies not to take FreeBSD as they
> cannot turn back to that company if things go wrong.
Solaris and MacOSX are the equivalents for this in the BSD world. I
first ask my customers to decide if they want to deploy on BSD, Linux
or Windows. After that, we talk about the exact flavour to use. If they
take my advice in the first round, it is BSD. If they don't need
Solaris, MacOSX, OpenBSD or NetBSD for a specific reason then there is
no reason not to use FreeBSD.
More information about the freebsd-advocacy