FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows

[Mike King]

We just put up a couple of 2003 servers at various clients. I also have
5.1 boxes running. If some one were willing to help me craft a good set
of tests I myght beable to swing a side by side comparison with matching
hardware...

Are there any takers?

Cheers, 
Mikel King 
Optimized Computer Solutions, INC 
39 West Fourteenth Street 
Second Floor 
New York, NY 10011 
http://www.ocsny.com 

+------------------------------------------+ 
You may like them. You will see. You may 
like them in a tree. 
http://www.FreeBSD.org 
http://www.OpenOffice.org 
http://www.Mozilla.org 
+------------------------------------------+ 
GOAL: Microsoft free in 2003 
+------------------------------------------+ 



-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Anderson [mailto:anderson at centtech.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Johnson David
Cc: advocacy at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows


Johnson David wrote:
> On Saturday 21 June 2003 09:58 am, Dan Langille wrote:
> 
> 
>>It should also be comparing Windows XP, not Windows 2000.  I don't 
>>think we'd like it if they looking at FreeBSD 4.2...
> 
> 
> Win2K is still very widely used in the market segments where FreeBSD
> might be considered. Most of the points against Win2K also apply to 
> WinXP, so maybe relabeling the column "Windows 2000/XP" is more 
> appropriate.

Actually, more appropriate would be Windows 2000 Advanced Server, right?

Windows XP is mainly for desktops, not servers..

Eric


_______________________________________________
freebsd-advocacy at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"