(Missing) power states of an Atom N455-based netbook

Jung-uk Kim jkim at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jun 28 19:14:49 UTC 2011


On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:28 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I think that part (but not all) of the differences between FreeBSD
> and Linux can be explained by the fact that FreeBSD currently
> doesn't advertise itself as featuring ACPI_CAP_SMP_C1_NATIVE and
> ACPI_CAP_SMP_C3_NATIVE.  I am not sure what it would take to
> actually support these features.  I think that Linux does support
> (or at least advertise support) for these features.

Yes, Linux supports this Intel-specific feature.  I think it shouldn't 
be too hard for us, however.  We just have to add support for 
Intel-specific _CST FFH (Functional Fixed Hardware) in 
sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c.  You can find more information from "Intel 
Processor Vendor-Specific ACPI" (order number 302223-005) on Intel 
website.  Also, arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c of Linux source may 
help.  I believe Linux actually supports all Intel-specific FFHs, 
BTW.

Jung-uk Kim


More information about the freebsd-acpi mailing list