acpica in stable/8

John Baldwin jhb at freebsd.org
Fri Feb 5 14:36:40 UTC 2010


On Friday 05 February 2010 3:37:06 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> I would like to bring version of ACPICA in stable/8 to that of head, that is
> 20100121.
> 
> Here's svn status and svn diff outputs for the merge:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/stable-8-acpi.status.txt
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/stable-8-acpi.diff
> 
> I've performed this MFC by doing series of svn merges first to sys, then to
> usr.sbin/acpi.  I hope that this is a correct approach.
> I have some doubts because of heard suggestions that such merges should be done
> from vendor area.  But, OTOH, in head there were direct commits sys to fix
> consequences of merge from vendor area.
> Subversion gurus, please advise!

You should just MFC the changes from HEAD.  You should not merge from the
vendor branch directly into a stable branch.  The only time that would be
appropriate would be to merge a vendor change into a stable branch that
was never merged to HEAD (e.g. if some vendor software 'foo' was upgraded
from version 1 to version 2 in HEAD but was version 1 in a stable branch
and later a patch release 1.1 that fixed a security bug came out, then 1.1
would be imported into the vendor area and directly merged to the stable
branch).

-- 
John Baldwin


More information about the freebsd-acpi mailing list