EST on PentiumD-T2080
William Grzybowski
william88 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 20:16:47 UTC 2009
Well, forget about it, sorry.
I realized that the static table is not really necessary, the est.c tries to fetch the table list from ACPI.
I recompiled the module once again and now the freq_list has a lot of possible frequencies, a lot more than before.
Before I send the first e-mail there as only 6 and I could not set any of them because was listed as XXXX/-1.
This problem is possible related to my bug laptop's acpi which has a lot of errors about allocating resources.
By the way, I already sent a couple of e-mails to this list before, ACPI is a subject which I really like, maybe there is any kind of task (development) that I could accomplish to help the freebsd project and increases my knowledge about this?
That's all, sorry for the annoyance with the previously e-mail.
William.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 07:31:18PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running 8-CURRENT from yesterday.
>
> Before the update I was running the snapshot for 2008-02.
>
> In this snapshot the cpufreq with EST seemed t be working fine, but after the update it is not recognizing the processor MSR.
>
> After a little bit of debugging I was able to get my MSR (32 most significant bits) as 0x06190d28 .
> And this value is not in the ESTprocs list, which would be ID32(1300, 1340, 600, 1100, 100) and does not make any sense for this CPU.
>
> So, the ESTprocs list hasn't changed for a while if I've looked it right which means the rdmsr instruction is returning the wrong data for some reason!?
>
> I am not any kind of the expert in the subject, just curious what could be wrong...
>
> The CPU is:
> CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2080 @ 1.73GHz (1733.41-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6ec Stepping = 12
> Features=0xbfe9fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
> Features2=0xc189<SSE3,MON,EST,TM2,xTPR,PDCM>
> AMD Features=0x100000<NX>
> TSC: P-state invariant
> Cores per package: 2
>
> Any toughts?
>
> Thank you.
More information about the freebsd-acpi
mailing list