cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h

[Juli Mallett]

* Yar Tikhiy <yar at comp.chem.msu.su> [ 2008-01-28 ]
	[ Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h ]
> But, hey, have you seen the diffs in the first place?  You seem to
> assume that my commit was only to kill the innocent int64_t.

Yes, actually.  I found some of the decisions strange, the work overall
worthwhile and the "long long" change particularly gauche.  Several others have
said things that I thought at the time, and I was following the discussion
closely.  (Your bogus standards reasoning was, in particular, a red flag, and I
suspect that that caught some people off-guard since your reasoning is
fallacious and that you would have gotten less grief for the change if you had
given less strange justifications (even no justifications) initially.)  You said
that you had received no back-out request, so I made one.  Instead of
acknowledging that you had now received a single backout request which you would
not honor (and I was only referring to the "long long" bit, for clarity), you
chose to grouch that I was rehashing old points (I do not believe backout
requests should come without reasoning attached.)

Thanks,
Juli.