cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults
src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl
sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile
sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf f
julian at elischer.org
Wed Oct 17 12:21:27 PDT 2007
Sam Leffler wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Quoting Scott Long <scottl at samsco.org> (Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:50:05 -0600):
keep in mind htere are a lot of people out here that have no opinion
as we haven't looked at it in detail, who may like the idea of a sensor
framework but don't know enough about this implementation to chime in.
I've seen 4 people who say they don't like it, and 3 or
4 (I wasn't counting) who said that they either liked it or at least
didn't see anything wrong with it.
SO it's not a clear cut as it may appear.
Having spent some time in past lives supporting various sensors,
I know that there is a crying need for some sort of framework
but that doesn't mean that it needs to be this one, or even in the kernel.
Maybe we can find someone to arbitrate. We used to have an
architecture board for
this purpose but we got rid of it.
More information about the cvs-src