cvs commit: src/sys/net if_bridge.c if_bridgevar.h
schwabe at uni-paderborn.de
Sun Jul 1 17:15:47 UTC 2007
Bruce M. Simpson schrieb:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:58:04PM +0000, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>> All non-tagged traffic is treated as vlan1 as per IEEE 802.1Q-2003
>> Common practice: non-tagged traffic is treated as "native vlan".
> I'm confused now. Is this practice different from what the 802.1Q
> standard says?
You can have a tagged Vlan 1 and an untaged (native in cisco speech) on
dot1q port (trunk in cisco speech). Some standard even uses vlan 0.
Iirc some Qos stuff.
A real world example:
description uplink cat6509-e
switchport trunk native vlan 506
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,323,506
Has a tagged vlan with ID 1 and an untagged vlan with corrosponds to
I have not looked at diff but if the native vlan or untagged ethernet
frames are treated as vlan 1 this example vlan 1 and vlan 506 would be
More information about the cvs-src