cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d cleartmp

Ceri Davies ceri at submonkey.net
Wed Oct 18 10:26:27 UTC 2006


On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:46:55AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:05:28PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:31:33PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:01:45PM +0000, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > > yar         2006-10-16 13:01:45 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD src repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     etc/rc.d             cleartmp 
> > > >   Log:
> > > >   Improve cleartmp in a number of aspects:
> > > >   
> > > >   + Use rc.subr(8) features properly.
> > > >   + Do the whole job of obliterating /tmp contents in find(1).
> > > >   + Leave lost+found and quota.{user,group} in /tmp only if root-owned.
> > > >   + Make the overall structure clearer by first removing the X dirs
> > > >     (perhaps along with the rest of /tmp) and then re-creating them.
> > > >   + Use "find -exec rm -rf {} +" for efficiency: each rm instance gets
> > > >     a chance to kill as much files in /tmp as ARG_MAX permits.
> > > 
> > > I was asked a few times why "-prune -exec rm -rf" had been chosen
> > > over "-delete".  My initial reason was that -delete would keep
> > > bogus lost+found and quota.{user,group} entries found in subdirs
> > > of /tmp.  Well, on second thought, the find command line can be
> > > tweaked so that -delete works as wanted.  E.g.:
> > > 
> > >                 cd /tmp && find -x . ! -name . \
> > >                     ! \( -path ./lost+found -type d -user root \) \
> > >                     ! \( \( -path ./quota.user -or -path ./quota.group \) \
> > >                         -type f -user root \) \
> > >                     -delete

<snip>

> > Given that we're deleting everything anyway, wouldn't it be possible to
> > remove quota.{group,user} regardless and let quotacheck recreate them if
> > required?  This shouldn't take too long since there won't be much there.
> 
> I haven't used quotas for quite a while, but I used to believe that
> administrative limits were stored in those files, too, not only
> current usage values.  Therefore quotas on /tmp usage would be
> effectively cancelled after a reboot if we just removed the files.

Sorry, of course you're right.

> > Also, if X requires certain directories, wouldn't it be better to blow
> > them away here and have them created from a boot time script?  Otherwise
> > I don't understand how they ever get created.

<snip>

> Oh, perhaps it isn't clear that this script is controlled by two
> partially independent rc.conf vars, clear_tmp_enable and clear_tmp_X.
> Their defaults are NO and YES, respectively.  In this mode, cleartmp
> removes only the X dirs from /tmp and then creates them.  If the
> settings are YES and YES, it removes all from /tmp (except a few)
> and then creates the X dirs.  For YES and NO, it just purges all
> junk from /tmp and creates nothing.

Ah hah.

Ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20061018/11730543/attachment.pgp


More information about the cvs-src mailing list