cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_vnops.c

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Friday,  2 June 2006 at 10:38:29 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:54:59AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Friday,  2 June 2006 at  2:50:47 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday 01 June 2006 06:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:49:50AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
>>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
>>>>>> the file must be open for writing.
>>>>>> .Sh RETURN VALUES
>>>>>> .Rv -std
>>>>>> +If the file to be modified is not a directory or
>>>>>> +a regular file, the
>>>>>> +.Fn truncate
>>>>>> +call will return the value 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't "value of 0" sound better?
>>>>
>>>> Not to me, though I can't explain why.  I think the phrase "X will return
>>>> the
>>>> value Y" is common in man pages though.
>>>
>>> "will return" sounds strange to be.
>>
>> Yes, it will be better if you avoid the future tense.
>
> May I recommend that one of you just change it?

What colour?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20060602/013d3c04/attachment.pgp