cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml

[Bruce A. Mah]

On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 09:57, Hiroki Sato wrote:

> bmah> I like that the markup for library names is now consistent.  I'm not
> bmah> 100% sure that <application></application> is the best choice; I usually
> bmah> used <filename></filename>.  But in any case I think this change was an
> bmah> improvement.
> 
>  Ah, actually I am still floating between the two (<application> and
>  <filename role="library"> or so)  While using <filename> is good
>  for consistency since it is also used for a package name, I think libfoo
>  is a component, not just a filename... So <application> is used just
>  to keep consistency for now.  Anyway, let me sleep on it ;)

OK, sounds good, thanks.  FWIW, it's not real obvious to me what the
right choice is, so hopefully this won't keep you from getting a good
night's sleep.  :-)

Bruce.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20040905/86c6d400/attachment.bin