cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 vm_machdep.c

Julian Elischer julian at elischer.org
Fri May 21 12:31:43 PDT 2004



On Fri, 21 May 2004, John Baldwin wrote:

> On Thursday 20 May 2004 04:04 pm, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 May 2004, Thomas Moestl wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004/05/20 at 11:48:19 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > While you are there, can you rename it to cpu_exit2()
> > > > as it has nothing to do with the scheduler..
> > >
> > > As I mentioned previously, the connection is that this function must
> > > be called with sched_lock held (and it must be held until the final
> > > cpu_throw() after that). It does tasks that have a connection to
> > > thread switching, so the name is not really inappropriate.
> > >
> > > cpu_exit2 is far less descriptive as a name.
> >
> > but less misleading than cpu_sched_sxit()
> >
> > switching is nothing to do with the scheduler..
> 
> Uh, switching between threads is all the scheduler does.  cpu_exit2() is a 
> horrible name.  One question for Thomas, can the sparc64 cpu_switch() and/or 

jeff's scheduler interface leaves the switch code out of the scheduler
interface.. The scheduler decides who to run but the switch code
actually does it and is scheduler independent..


> cpu_throw() just call this function directly to avoid having exit1
> ()/thread_exit()/whoever know about it?

not a bad idea.

> 
> -- 
> John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org
> 



More information about the cvs-src mailing list