cvs commit: src/release/picobsd/build picobsd
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun Mar 21 15:03:40 PST 2004
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:05:26AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:37:27AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:27:05AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > The advantage of having picobsd and all stripped down variants
> > > of FreeBSD in a port (perhaps with their own category)
> > picobsd has had its own category for 2 years, and it has been sitting
> > there untouched with only one port in it ever since. In fact I've
> > been intending to remove the category soon and move that port back to
> > net/. The usual rule of thumb for a new category is that it must
> > contain 10 ports and have significant reason for a separate existence.
> I would say that a sensible rule of thumb would include
> is the second part only. Otherwise by the same reasoning you should
> also kill arabic, hebrew, hungarian, plan9.
> Anyways, once you populate the category with picobsd, minibsd,
> nanobsd and friends, and the tinyware stuff, you quickly reach
> the critical mass.
Where are these ports?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/attachments/20040321/b6bf1d6c/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-src