cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c vfs_subr.c

[Alfred Perlstein]

* John Baldwin <jhb at FreeBSD.org> [040715 11:56] wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 01:29 am, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >   Also, why do you copy the proc name to the stack lower in
> > >   kern_shutdown.c?  Do you fear that the proc might change from
> > >   under you when you're at the bottom and you can't therefore
> > >   only keep a reference to the proc instead?
> >
> > Because I don't know if the proc will be there after it nukes itself.
> 
> They don't nuke themselves, they just go to sleep.  A quick look at the code 
> would have revealed this.

y'know what, in the context of fixing a printf I wasn't really
interested in looking that far into the scheduler.  A 20 char stack
variable and a string copy at shutdown isn't such a big deal.  If it
bugs you guys that much, why don't you just fix it?

Or are you worried about getting 15 emails about how you inefficiently
printing a non-critical string like I have? :)

hugs,
-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright at mu.org cell: 408-480-4684