cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.sys.mk

[David O'Brien]

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 04:53:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > PLEASE DO NOT ADD ANY MORE STD= TO MAKEFILES.  When this came up in
> > freebsd-arch you did not have support for this, and you are majorly
> > trumpling over a change Mux and I have been working on and announced to
> > freebsd-arch.
> 
> I can't find anything about it in my archive.  Could you please send
> me the message-id or a copy of the original?

The thread started with:
    From: Maxime Henrion <mux at freebsd.org>
    Subject: WARNS=6 changes
    Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:20:45 +0100
    To: arch at FreeBSD.org
    Message-ID: <20030313192045.GG3819 at elvis.mu.org>

you proposed this commit of yours:
    Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:32:36 +0100
    Message-ID: <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf at flood.ping.uio.no>
    Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:52:02 +0100
    Message-ID: <xzpllzfctbx.fsf at flood.ping.uio.no>

it was disliked by:
    From: Maxime Henrion <mux at freebsd.org>
    Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:45:07 +0100
    Message-ID: <20030316234507.GK3819 at elvis.mu.org>
    Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:11:00 +0100
    Message-ID: <20030317001100.GM3819 at elvis.mu.org>

    From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at freebsd.org>
    Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:21:34 -0800
    Message-ID: <20030317002134.GA79649 at dragon.nuxi.com>
    From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at freebsd.org>
    Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:29:57 -0800
    Message-ID: <20030316162956.A78205 at hub.freebsd.org>

    From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru at freebsd.org>
    Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:21:44 +0200
    Message-ID: <20030314182144.GA98870 at sunbay.com>
    From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru at FreeBSD.ORG>
    Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:12:36 +0200
    Message-ID: <20030314201236.GD8760 at sunbay.com>
    (RU didn't want WARNS= to be variable/non-deterministic due to a STD
    variable)

so you committed this patch even when it was reviewed and disliked.  I
greatly regret I ever asked Mux to be nice to the community and post his
desire to arch@ instead of just committing it and blind siding everyone.


> Do you have an estimate for when gcc 3.3 will hit the tree?

RSN if certain things would hold still.