cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica acconfig.h acenv.h acfreebsd.h acgcc.h acpi.h acpiosxf.h acpixf.h acutils.h dbcmds.c dbxface.c exfldio.c exsystem.c hwsleep.c psparse.c rscreate.c tbget.c utglobal.c

[Marcel Moolenaar]

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 04:45:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> >> The question: do people think we should try to get another ACPI
> >> snapshot in (provided we have someone willing to do it) and thus
> >> try to get it fixed the "official" way or are we ok with changing
> >> contrib'd code in this case and revert to the vendor branch when
> >> we do upgrade sometime after 5.1?
> > 
> > I've been told that it's not possible to put files back on the vendor
> > branch after 5.0 since it breaks cvs -D.  I would have liked to put a lot
> > of the files back on due to the fact that they haven't had local changes
> > for quite a few drops.
> > 
> > That being said, I'm willing to spend time fixing the 0228 dist but am not
> > going to have enough time to roll another in May.  If someone else would
> > like to take this up, it would be nice.
> 
> I might be able to do the next one since I've learned a bit more
> about how these imports work.

I just sent mail to acpi-jp at jp. with two patches. Both address the
same problem. The first is large(r) and tested. The second is a
one-liner but untested. We'll see...

FYI,

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel at xcllnt.net