cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

[Marcelo Araujo]

2012/5/25 Eitan Adler <eadler at freebsd.org>

> On 24 May 2012 19:03, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK Eitan,
> >
> > I need to say sorry to everybody, because for security issues, I never
> have
> > asked anyone for approvals in case there is a maintainer time out.
> > My BAD!
>
> Note that security fixes may cause their own problems (the fix breaks
> everything else?). This is why explicit approval is needed.  The
> maintainer should usually be contacted but in extreme cases portmgr or
> so may approve as well. (IMHO it should be expanded to secteam... but
> meh)
>
>
Well, we are talking specifically in the case of haproxy. It doesn't break
anything right, does it?
So, I do believe there is no problem with that commit.

Best Regards,
-- 
Marcelo Araujo
araujo at FreeBSD.org