cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo

[Jason Helfman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:12:15PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake:
>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake:
>> >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
>> >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe
>> >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval.
>> >
>> >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve.
>> >
>> >
>> Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still
>> required for a timeout?
>>
>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15
>>
>> I also added this to a note on this pr:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165035
>>
>> That being said, is there going to be a vuxml write-up for this commit?
>>
>> -jgh
>>
>> --
>> Jason Helfman
>> FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve
>
>If there a security fix just go ahead and commit along with a vuxml entry.
>
>regards,
>Bapt

I've committed the entry. The port was already updated, but fixed and closed
the pr.

- -jgh

- -- 
Jason Helfman
FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvsj7AAoJECBZmmNBUNPcQOEIALHVSwYISzLDbmrReLyw3aZK
6QvE3eaNcw+aRIGT4SsUbKWIVrWj0zurs5l5h9jgVv2EJB/gjRTU0Drw0wIllXVB
FyYq/BbOrs6x5BP1WhtLNU4+xVzRZLfr1RICbtw02p6YUujazomAFX8MYObtACk7
7z5L7DBuKzkEnHkEUntO+McdHpE79w10gS2VVeJC2Rjiy888D5rRqbgsY4es5Z7z
3UbcvSFxiGzWVeQ+TdbzwVMdxaj9a8cGSgz77v56VGkTKPuoLwowi8RfqNeX2rP6
htBL02mIn0TNYvALr82hUuwEzD+2/JyqoDzg+8Q/jXBawkfqTB2nZX7i67Utvfg=
=wT57
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----