cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/tzdialog
Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
bapt at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 16 07:32:44 UTC 2012
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:28:21PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 23:30, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > On Sun Jan 15 23:15:11 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> When adding things to ports that duplicate base functionality it is
> >> customary to say how they are better than what we already have. :)
> > As usual Patch are welcome :).
> Yeah, that completely doesn't answer my question. You were the one who
> committed this port. Can you please explain why?
1/ because submitter proposed it to the ports tree, since when are we juging
when should go in or not (if maintained) when dealing with port?
2/ because it adds feature tzsetup doesn't have like the Xdialog version?
4/ some people creating their own install media are happy to be able to pick it
from the ports
5/ people are now able to easily test/compare both tzsetup/tzdialog which might
help if tzdialog is to be proposed directly in base.
Do we really need more reasons ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/attachments/20120116/fcc2ad3d/attachment.pgp
More information about the cvs-ports