cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/ged Makefile
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jan 4 12:14:05 UTC 2012
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote:
> > > Actually, I don't really see the benefit of this port. But there was
> > > a request for it and it seemed like little effort to maintain it ;)
> > Per quoted above, it should not be added. Contrary to GNU versions of sed
> > and awk, if base ed(1) can be used as drop-in replacement, over-populating
> > ports collection just because someone wanted to remain their work in the
> > history does not warrant it. I believe the best would be to follow up with
> > maintainer and either 1) find out and explain in pkg-descr what this port
> > can do that base ed(1) cannot; or 2) cvs rm it.
> It is not a question of a maintainer wanting their name in the tree.
> I'm the maintainer of this port now - and my name is in enough locations
> as it is.
Ah, sorry, I somehow got under impression that someone submitted the shar to
you for commit.
> I'll try and find out what the added value of this version is, and will
> remove it again if there isn't any.
More information about the cvs-ports