cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml

Adam McDougall mcdouga9 at egr.msu.edu
Wed Feb 29 14:41:38 UTC 2012


On 02/28/12 14:19, Chris Rees wrote:
> crees       2012-02-28 19:19:01 UTC
>
>    FreeBSD ports repository
>
>    Modified files:
>      security/vuxml       vuln.xml
>    Log:
>    Document latest PostgreSQL vulnerabilities
>
>    Security:       http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1377/
>
>    Revision  Changes    Path
>    1.2620    +36 -1     ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
> _______________________________________________

I think the postgresql server ports require the client to be installed, 
but shouldn't vuxml list the server ports as vulnerable too?  I think 
the current state gives a misleading impression of where the 
vulnerabilities reside and detract attention from upgrading server 
processes.  Thanks.


More information about the cvs-ports mailing list