cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml
Adam McDougall
mcdouga9 at egr.msu.edu
Wed Feb 29 14:41:38 UTC 2012
On 02/28/12 14:19, Chris Rees wrote:
> crees 2012-02-28 19:19:01 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> security/vuxml vuln.xml
> Log:
> Document latest PostgreSQL vulnerabilities
>
> Security: http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1377/
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.2620 +36 -1 ports/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
> _______________________________________________
I think the postgresql server ports require the client to be installed,
but shouldn't vuxml list the server ports as vulnerable too? I think
the current state gives a misleading impression of where the
vulnerabilities reside and detract attention from upgrading server
processes. Thanks.
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list