cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm
Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Sun Feb 19 19:11:06 UTC 2012
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:56:45PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 16:45:28 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:09:44AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > > Alexey, I appreciate your perspective on this, but I want to make
> > > sure you are aware of the related discussion (and opposing
> > > viewpoints) on freebsd-ports:
> > Yes, I've heard that reasoning a number of times since I started to
> > hack on ports, which is a relatively long period.
> Your long hacking tenure aside, I am just glad to know you are aware of
> other reasonable opinions on this topic.
Don't get me wrong, I just wanted to make myself clear that I've had enough
time to collect various opinions on the subject to make some meaningful
judgment about it. No way I am implying that my opinions should have more
weight than others' just because of that.
> > Technically, since there is no supporting infrastructure to ensure if
> > some app really requires particular shlib version or not (and I
> > personally do not see how it can be implemented automatically for any
> > arbitrary port out there), the whole issue right now is little more
> > than a matter of personal preference.
> Emphasis on 'personal preference'.
No sure I quite understand what do you mean. Perhaps you could elaborate?
So far it seems that my assessments are not being counterargued with valid
technical points and facts.
More information about the cvs-ports