cvs commit: ports/www/libxul Makefile distinfo
beat at FreeBSD.org
Sat Oct 8 06:22:45 UTC 2011
On Oct 8, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 13:59, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> beat 2011-10-07 20:59:11 UTC
>> FreeBSD ports repository
>> Modified files:
>> www/libxul Makefile distinfo
>> - Update to 220.127.116.11
>> - Use Firefox source tarball to build libxul as upstrem no longer provides
>> xulrunner tarballs for the 1.9.2 branch.
> I'm excited to see an update to this vulnerable port, but I'm wondering
> why require the 3.6.23 version instead of the latest version which most
> users would have on their system already?
Because newer xulrunner versions removed gtkmozembed which is used
by a large number of depended ports. Flo and I did a test on a tinderbox
with libxul 7.0 (which is already in our gecko repository) and it breaks quite
some port. Unfortunately for most of these ports upstream doesn't provide a
newer version which no longer depends on gtkmozembed. Patching all
these ports manually is quite some work and I don't want to do this. But it
looks like you are going to volunteer?
>> Discussed with: flo@ at EuroBSDCon DevSummit
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.31 +3 -4 ports/www/libxul/Makefile
>> 1.17 +2 -2 ports/www/libxul/distinfo
> Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
> -- OK Go
> Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the cvs-ports