cvs commit: ports/astro/orsa Makefile

[Sahil Tandon]

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:05:57 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 18:38:52 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >
> >>Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:38:41 +0000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>stephen     2011-06-16 22:38:41 UTC
> >>>>
> >>>>   FreeBSD ports repository
> >>>>
> >>>>   Modified files:
> >>>>     astro/orsa           Makefile
> >>>>   Log:
> >>>>   - Track updated dependency
> >>>>   - Bump PORTREVISION
> >>>
> >>>Please remember to bump other ports that are affected by the math/GiNaC
> >>>shlib change.
> >>
> >>Already done.  The only other port that uses math/GiNaC is
> >>math/octave-forge-symbolic, and that port was updated at the same
> >>time as math/GiNaC.
> >
> >Really?  Then was this wrong a few months ago:
> >
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-March/213042.html
> 
> If you look inside the Makefile of science/mbdyn, it has:
> 
> GINAC "Enable GiNaC-support (not implemented yet)" off
> 
> That is why I decided it wasn't necessary to bump this port's portrevision.
> 
> But now that I think about it,  I guess that technically someone
> might have decided to build this port with this option set to on,
> and maybe I should have checked to see if the port then built even
> though it said this option is "not implemented yet".
> 
> This port's maintainer is maho who is one of my mentors, and I did
> ask them about this.

OK, thanks for explaining your rationale.  My confusions stems from
seeing bumps in March that were not present this time around.

-- 
Sahil Tandon <sahil at FreeBSD.org>