cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile
az at freebsd.org
Tue Feb 22 17:10:58 UTC 2011
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Erwin Lansing <erwin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> > On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> > >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit
> > >> has been in the tree for some number of hours?
> > >
> > > Nope. For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that
> > > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong.
> > >
> > > mcl
> > What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2,
> > or is a PORTEPOCH bump required?
> Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough. There's no
> need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
> upgrade again to +2. PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
> cannot go down.
How about to fix it? :-)
> Erwin Lansing http://droso.org
> Prediction is very difficult
> especially about the future erwin at FreeBSD.org
More information about the cvs-ports