cvs commit: ports/cad/admesh Makefile
mandree at FreeBSD.org
Sun Aug 14 15:52:01 UTC 2011
Am 14.08.2011 05:00, schrieb Alexey Dokuchaev:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:20:40PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> * Matthias Andree (mandree at FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>>> Possibly we should always mark ports for removal for three months after
>>> the point in time when the maintainer gets reset to ports at .
>> Nice. Well that'll only result in two processes: more and more ports
>> will have maintainers reset and then removed, and remaining maintainers
>> will take more and more ports beyond their ability to maintain them,
>> both will lead to collapse. Is this also not undesirable?
> Big +1 for Dmitry here; ports@ is perfectly fine maintainer entity, much
> easier to work with, and often receives more and better care than many of
> seemingly "properly" maintained ports.
Assuming that were true, how else do we make sure not to let rotten code
linger in the ports tree?
More information about the cvs-ports