cvs commit: ports/archivers/hs-zip-archive Makefile distinfo
pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-binary Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-darcs/files patch-Setup.lhs patch-darcs.cabal
ports/devel/hs-darcs Makefile distinfo pkg-d
amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru
Mon May 24 22:05:06 UTC 2010
* Gabor PALI (pgj at FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> > I think that's a very bad idea - hs- prefixes (as well as py-/p5-
> > etc.) should not be applied to end-user applications, and this is
> > a huge POLA violation.
> I was thinking about creating slave ports with the original name for
> the "popular" ports. What do you think?
What's the purpose for renaming them at all? In the first place,
those are end-user applications named darcs, xmonad etc., so ports
should be named darcs and xmonad correspondingly, regardless of
language they're written in and regardless of whether they install
modules for that language.
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3 at jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
More information about the cvs-ports