cvs commit: ports/graphics/dri Makefile

[Marius Strobl]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:50:12 +0100
> Marius Strobl <marius at alchemy.franken.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:59:37AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 16:55, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:05:06AM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > > linimon     2010-03-22 05:05:06 UTC
> > > > > 
> > > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Modified files:
> > > > >     graphics/dri         Makefile 
> > > > >   Log:
> > > > >   Mark as broken on ia64 and sparc64: fails to install.
> > > > >   
> > > > >   Hat:            portmgr
> > > > >   
> > > > 
> > > > The following patch fixes the powerpc [sic] and sparc64 build of the
> > > > default Mesa3D 7.4.4 after the 7.6.1 integration:
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mesa3d_7.6.1_unbreak.diff
> > > > Is it okay to commit?
> > > 
> > > Looks good to me, this will save me some work now that I have both a
> > > powerpc and sparc64 boxes to play with.  In looking at mesa git, I think
> > > I'll be making a few changes shortly...
> > > 
> > 
> > So could someone please either approve or commit it (I have only
> > a src bit).
> > 
> 
> Looks to me like Robert already approved it.

I think interpreting his comment as an "Approved by:" rather than
a "Reviewed by:" would be stretching it a bit too much.

> 
> Having only a src commit bit shouldn't prevent your making a ports commit.
> I've seen ports committers make src commits.
> 

Sure, but you always need an explicit approval for committing to
a repository you don't have a bit for (at least so I've been told).

Marius