cvs commit: ports/java/jgraphx Makefile distinfo
rfarmer at predatorlabs.net
Mon Aug 30 02:04:22 UTC 2010
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:53 AM, b. f. <bf1783 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 8/29/10, Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 29 August 2010 01:11, Rob Farmer <rfarmer at predatorlabs.net> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2010/8/27 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at freebsd.org>:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:32PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>>> Alternatively you could have it as another distfile in Scilab rather
>>>> than depending on the port....
> I think that would be the best short-term solution, since jgraphx does
> not exist solely to be used for scilab.
> Rob, isn't scilab 2.3.0 coming out soon? It has been 4 weeks since
> beta 2, and 8 weeks since beta 1. What versions of jgraphx will 2.3.0
> support? I think scilab git is now using jgraphx 22.214.171.124. Will this
> problem disappear for a while with the new release?
Probably not - Scilab 5.3.0 Betas (and probably the release) target
126.96.36.199, which is already several versions out of date. While the
configure script says this is a minimum, I doubt much beyond that will
run. As you can see in the this commit, even for minor point releases,
jgraphx renames methods, changes what arguments they take, etc. so you
pretty much have to target a precise version:
More information about the cvs-ports