cvs commit: ports MOVED ports/security Makefile
ports/security/isolate Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 17 17:45:30 UTC 2010
On 08/17/2010 07:36, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:24:16PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> 2010/8/17 Wesley Shields<wxs at freebsd.org>:
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:04:26PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>> bapt ? ? ? ?2010-08-17 13:04:26 UTC
>>>> ? FreeBSD ports repository
>>>> ? Modified files:
>>>> ? ? . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?MOVED
>>>> ? ? security ? ? ? ? ? ? Makefile
>>>> ? Removed files:
>>>> ? ? security/isolate ? ? Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
>>>> ? Log:
>>>> ? Security vulnerability: local root privileges escalation problems
>>> Wow, this seems a little excessive to me. Why was this removed? Is
>>> upstream not going to fix the problem(s)? Isn't marking it broken and a
>>> vuxml entry enough while we give them time to address the problems?
>>> -- WXS
>> Sorry my log wasn't descriptive enough. Upstream asked me to remove
>> the ports, so did the maintainer.
>> Also upstream removed the google code page for the project and
>> currently doesn't plan a fix.
>> I'll try to make better commit log next time.
> I was just curious because this seemed like a knee-jerk reaction on
> our part. Turns out that it was directed by upstream and maintainer,
> which is completely understandable. I was merely trying to make sure we
> avoid knee-jerk reactions. Thank you for the clarification.
IMO a forced commit to indicate this is justified here.
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
More information about the cvs-ports