cvs commit: ports/games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
pkg-plist ports/games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Sun Aug 8 19:50:22 UTC 2010
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:37:12PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
> On 08-08-2010 21:30, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:59:36PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote:
> >>rene 2010-08-08 17:59:36 UTC
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >> Modified files:
> >> games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
> >> games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile
> >> Added files:
> >> games/stonesoup/files patch-rltiles__Makefile
> >> Log:
> >> - Update to 0.7.1
> >> - Split off SDL version into games/stonesoup-sdl slave port
> >> - Note the new WWW site in pkg-descr
> >What was wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS? PR does not give
> >sufficient details.
> >We generally try to avoid creating slaves unless fairly strong reason
> >exist. Lots of ports optionally support SDL, imagine the numbers if we
> >factored it all out in to slaves.
> Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I
> merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert
> factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit.
I will try, but this is not how it normally works: we do not blindly
commit one's submissions. Submitter may be not aware about all possible
implications their diff has; it is the committer's responsibility to
make sure every part of proposed diff has it merits. Saying "I merely
followed the PR" is definitely not enough.
More information about the cvs-ports