cvs commit: ports/net-im/libpurple Makefile
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 24 03:40:33 PDT 2009
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:19:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:08:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Since silc is off by default (and therefore the package won't change),
> >> was this necessary?
> > There are two viewpoints to this:
> > 1) The option is off by default so the package won't change, and thus
> > PORTREVISION doesn't need to be bumped.
> > 2) Not bumping PORTREVISION may cause the port to misbehave if it's
> > built with old libraries.
> I don't see the logic in this. The port works just fine right now with
> the old libraries. Can you be more specific about the scenario you're
> concerned about?
Per what I see, shlib version of libsilcclient was bumped during
devel/silc-toolkit update. Since net-im/libpurple explicitly depends on
named library, PORTREVISION bump is in order, since API could have
changed (thus the shlib version bump). If silc-toolkit update was
merely a bugfix one, and shlib version retained, PORTREVISION should be
More information about the cvs-ports