cvs commit: ports/astro/nightfall Makefile ports/benchmarks/himenobench Makefile ports/benchmarks/hpl Makefile ports/biology/molden Makefile ports/biology/ortep3 Makefile ports/biology/platon Makefile ports/biology/psi88 Makefile ports/biology/tinker ...

[Doug Barton]

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> Because all the fortran code must be recompiled against new and
>> incompatible fortran library.
>
> Yep.  Strictly speaking, only ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes that depend on
> some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes, or ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes
> which some  other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes depends on would have
> needed the bump (modulo potential additional "manual" dependencies).
>
> I believe we do not have a reasonable way to determine such a cover, and
> all those OPTIONS and knobs make this even more tricky.  And the result
> likely would have been pretty close to the full set anyway...

Thank you both for the explanation.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection