cvs commit: ports/graphics/libraw Makefile
mezz7 at cox.net
Wed May 7 21:47:08 UTC 2008
On Wed, 07 May 2008 15:22:18 -0500, Sergey A. Osokin <osa at FreeBSD.org>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 May 2008 08:06:12 -0500, Sergey A. Osokin <osa at FreeBSD.org>
>> >osa 2008-05-07 13:06:12 UTC
>> > FreeBSD ports repository
>> > Modified files:
>> > graphics/libraw Makefile
>> > Log:
>> > Add documentation and examples.
>> > Also, add compile optimization. [*]
>> > Bump PORTREVISION.
>> There is no such of -O4 in GCC document. You should change it to make
>> sense, -O3.
> I've talk about compile optimization with libraw author and he said he
> gcc 3.x and 4.x and his optimization works like a charm.
> I'm also test -O4 on my FreeBSD 6.2-S box and under 8.0-C on amd64
> Jeremy, do you have any problem with compiling libraw?
There is no problem and I am not using it. The -O4 and above are same as
with -O3, so it doesn't make any sense for anyone to get above than -O3
since it doesn't exists in ideal. Why not add -O3 instead of -O4 to be
more realistic? Also, avoid the blindspot when GCC addes -O4 in future
that might break other application that use libraw. It can makes difficult
> I'm also Cc'ed this letter to libraw author Alex Tutubalin.
> Alex, could you provide more information about compile optimization?
The URL of GCC docuement isn't good enough? Unless there is an unoffical
-O4 patch? Feel free to correct me.
It's only a suggest, so the choice is your.
> Thank you.
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the cvs-ports