cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files

Henrik Brix Andersen brix at
Fri Jan 25 23:54:44 PST 2008

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:34:12PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>>>> Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
>>>> was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS...
>>> There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port 
>>> to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log 
>>> for more information on why.
>> That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports
>> have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their
>> Makefile in FreeBSD ports?
>> Why would this be needed for portmaster? 
> Why do you care?

Well, you wrote that the commit log contained information on why you
did this... Since this must be considered pretty non-standard (as far
as I can tell, no other ports have this requirement), I'm quite
curious as to why this was needed.

Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 217 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the cvs-ports mailing list